MEHTAB S.GILL
Sudershan Chopra – Appellant
Versus
Company Law Board, Principal Bench – Respondent
Mehtab S.Gill, J.
1. The petitioners have prayed for issuing a writ in the nature of mandamus quashing order dated December 8, 2000 (Annexure P-1).
2. The petitioners have averred that the rights of the petitioners have been affected by not relegating the parties to arbitration. It has been further averred that Section 7 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter called the "1996 Act"), postulates a contract between the parties and if there is an agreement for arbitration, the parties should be relegated to the jurisdiction of an arbitrator. A contract between a party having an arbitration agreement, a formal agreement is not necessary. It has been further averred that the meaning of expression "First statement on the substance of the dispute", has wrongly been interpreted by the Company Law Board. It has been further averred that, contesting an interlocutory application, would amount to acquiescence and it would be a step in the direction of the first statement. The "Hind Samachar Limited" was incorporated by the Indian Companies Act, 1930 with an authorised capital of Rs. 35 lacs. The main objects of the company are publishing of Newspapers, Journals, Maga
Bharat Steel Tubes Ltd. Etc. Etc. V/s. Gujarat Steel Tubes Mazdoor Sabha And Ors.
Food Corporation Of India And Anr. V/s. Yadav Engineer And Contractor
Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation V/s. Bawant Regular Motor Service, Amravati And Ors.
Manna Lal Kedia V/s. State Of Bihar
Chandavarkar Sita Ratna Rao V/s. Ashalata S. Guram
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.