SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(P&H) 222

SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Amrit Pal Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Roshan Lal – Respondent


Judgment

Satish Kumar Mittal, J.

1. Smt. Amrit Pal Kaur (hereinafter referred to as the appellant-wife) wife of Roshan Lal (hereinafter referred to as the respondent-husband) has field the instant appeal under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) against the judgment and decree passed by Additional District Judge, Faridkot, vide which the petition for divorce filed by the respondent-husband under Section 13 of the Act has been allowed and a decree of divorce has been passed on the ground of cruelty.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the marriage between the parties was solemnized in the year 1984. Two children were born from this wedlock, who are now aged about 11 years and 9 years. After 12 years of the marriage, the respondent-husband filed the instant divorce petition for dissolution of marriage between the parties on the ground that the appellant-wife is treating him with cruelty. In the petition, he alleged that after six months of the marriage, the appellant-wife started misbehaving with him, as she used to leave his house for her parents house without his permission. It was further alleged that she was not having any love and a













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top