SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(P&H) 163

HEMANT GUPTA
Narinder Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Narinder Pal – Respondent


Judgment

Hemant Gupta, J.

1. The present appeal is by the wife aggrieved against the judgment and decree passed by learned Additional District Judge, Hoshiarpur dissolving the marriage between the parties on the ground of cruelty, desertion and adultery.

2. Marriage between the parties was solemnized on 21.1.1983 as per Sikh rites at village Barri Buddi, Police Station Nazibabad, District Bijnaur, U.P. Two sons were born out of the wedlock of the parties in June 1984 and June 1987. Respondent No. 1-husband has sought dissolution of marriage on the ground that the wife has been treating the husband with cruelty since after the solemnization of marriage. There is total destruction of love and affection on the part of the wife and it has become impossible for the husband to operate the marriage any more. It was alleged that at the time of solemnization of marriage of the husband, all his brothers & sisters were married & the husband was living with his parents in the ancestral house. The wife asked the husband for separate mess and residence immediately after the marriage and under the compelling circumstances the husband had to separate himself from his parents, although the father &















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top