Satish Kumar Mittal, J.

1. This judgment will dispose of the following four Regular Second Appeals :-

(i) R.S.A. No. 129 of 2000, Dasa Singh and Gian Singh v. Jasmer Singh (ii) R.S.A. No. 130 of 2000, Dasa Singh and Gian Singh v. Ajmer Singh and Hardial Singh. (iii) R.S.A. No. 1091 of 2000, Jasmer Singh v. Dasa Singh and Gian Singh. The aforesaid appeals have arisen from the following two civil suits, filed by Jasmer Singh and his two brothers Ajmer Singh and Hardial Singh against their father Dasa Singh and brother Gian Singh: (i) Civil Suit N0.447-CS dated 8/5/1992Jasmer Singh v. Dara Singh and Gian Singh (ii) Civil Suit No.49 dated 21.12.1992Ajmer Singh and Hardial Singh v. Dasa Singh and Gian Singh Since in both the suits, the identical questions of facts and law were involved, therefore, they were consolidated by the trial Court.

2. The brief facts of the case are that Dasa Singh was having four sons, namely Gian Singh, Jasmer Singh, Ajmer Singh and Hardial Singh. He was also having two daugh ters, who were married and one of whom has now expired. The family of Dasa Singh was a Joint Hindu Family and in the revenue record, the land measuring 140 kanals 5 marlas was rec