SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(P&H) 1221

SWATANTER KUMAR, S.S.SARON
T. S. Gandhok – Appellant
Versus
Punjab And Sind Bank – Respondent


Judgment

S. S. Saron, J.

1. The present petition has been filed for quashing the charge-sheets dated 24.2.1999 and 16.6.2000 Annexure P-7 and P-8 respectively on the ground that the same have been issued without jurisdiction and that the petitioner had already left the service of the respondent Punjab and Sind on account of his resignation submitted on 23.5.1997 and the Game having deemed to have been accepted in view of the provisions of Regulation 20 (2) and (3) of the Punjab and Sind Bank (Officers) Service Regulations, 1982 (hereinafter to be referred as the Regulations ). The petitioner also claims the relief of his terminal dues i. e. gratuity, provident fund etc. , alongwith interest at the rate of 18% p. a. for the period of delay in making the payment.

2. The facts leading to the case are that the petitioner was working as Manager, Punjab and Sind Bank. He in terms of letter dated 12.1.1997 Annexure P-l sought voluntary retirement from service of the Bank on the ground that he had not been keeping good health for the last several months. No response to the notice dated 12.1.1997 Annexure P-l was received. The petitioner treated the notice as having been accepted by the resp


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top