SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(P&H) 1167

NIRMAL SINGH
Pardeep Singh – Appellant
Versus
Amar Singh - – Respondent


Judgment

Nirmal Singh, J.

1. Amar Singh filed a complaint against the petitioners under Section 3 of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989 (hereinafter referred to as "the SC/ST Act") on the allegations that he belonged to Mezbi caste and has been declared as scheduled caste. Manjit Kaur, wife of Jaswant Singh, daughter-in-law of the complainant contested the election of Sarpanch of village Jethu Nangal Block Majitha held on 21.6.1998 and Gurwant Kaur wife of Pardeep Singh was her opponent. It is further case of the complainant that the accused belonged to Jat caste. On 21.6.1998 at 8 a.m. the election had started at polling booth at village Jethu Nangal and at that time, accused persons started threatening and mandhanled the complainant and his daughter-in-law. When the complainant and his daughter-in-law resisted, accused remarked "that these Kute chuhras will not be allowed to contest the election of sarpanch and would not be allowed to cast vote." The matter was reported to the police, but no action was taken. Then complainant filed a complaint in the court of Illaqa Magistrate and the accused were summoned to face the trial Court under Sec



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top