SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(P&H) 1190

SWATANTER KUMAR
Didar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Joint Director Panchayat – Respondent


Judgment

Swatanter Kumar, J.

1. By this judgment, I propose to dispose of the above titled writ petitions as common question is involved in all these petitions. The necessary facts for decision of these writ petitions are taken from C.W.P. No. 8448 of 1987.

2. In this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner prays for the issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction quashing order dated 26.9.1987, Annexure P-4 to the writ petition and order dated 6.12.1984 passed by the Appellate Authority, Annexure P-3 to the writ petition, vide which the petitioner has been ordered to be evicted from the land in dispute.

3. The facts giving rise to the present petition are that petitioner claims to be owner in possession of the land in dispute. He has claimed that the land is owned and possessed by him for generations and in the jamabandi for the year 1948-49, he was recorded as "Shamilat Deh Hasab Rasad Zar Khewat" in the column of ownership while in the column of cultivation, it was recorded as "Maqbuza Malkan". On the strength of the documents produced by him before the revenue authorities, he claimed to be the owner of the land and, according to t







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top