J.M.Tandon, J.

1. The petitioners are the owners-landlord of the rented land in dispute situated in Ludhiana and in occupation of the respondents as tenants were they are carrying on the business of selling fire-wood and coal. In 1976 the petitioners filed an ejectment petition against the respondents on the ground personal requirement of Sham Lal petitioner where he desisted to start a similar business of selling fire-wood and coal. The Rent Controller vide order dated 4th August, 1980 held that the claim of Sham Lal for personal requirement of the rented land was genuine and the respondents were ordered to be ejected. The respondents assailed the order of the Rent Controller in appeal. The Appellate Authority accepted the appeal vide order dated 9th February, 1982, holding that Sham Lal petitioner did not genuinely require the land in dispute for his personal use and further the petitioners had an open plot adjacent to the rented land in dispute, where the business could be started by Sham Lal, if he so desired. The order of the Rent Controller was consequently, set aside and the ejectment application of the petitioners dismissed. It is against this order of the Appellate