1. Facts giving rise to this revision petition are these.

2. There was a dispute between the parties which on 7-4-1979 was referred to an arbitrator for decision. The arbitrator on 26-7-1979 passed the award. Jagan Nath, the petitioner herein, presumably on notice received of the making of the award, filed an application on 10-8-1979 for the filing in court of the award for making it a rule of Court: Within the time prescribed, from the date of service of the notice of the filing of the award, Hans Raj, one of the respondents herein, filed objections claiming that the award be not made rule of the Court The Court applied its mind, but came to the conclusion on 16-10-1980 that the award could not be made rule of Court until and unless it was registered. The appellate Court, however, upset that order and the matter was remitted back to the trial Judge for re-decision. It is at this stage that on 17-2-1984 an application was moved by Jagan Nath petitioner, seeking to amend his application for filing in Court the award to make it a rule of Court. This application was allowed on 21-2-1984 whereby two factual statements were allowed to be added to. Consequently, the application d