SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(P&H) 369

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
K.P.S.Sandhu, J.
Achhar Singh
Versus
State Of Punjab
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 492 of 1983,
Decided On : MAY 21, 1984

In cases involving attempt to murder, the prosecution must prove the intention to kill and the overt act beyond reasonable doubt. Any delay in lodging the first information report, lack of corroborating evidence, and enmity between the parties may raise doubts about the prosecution case and entitle the accused to the benefit of doubt.

Headnote:

ATTEMPT TO MURDER - SECTION 307 OF THE INDIAN PENAL CODE - DELAY IN LODGING FIRST INFORMATION REPORT - WITNESSES NOT SUPPORTING THE PROSECUTION CASE - BENEFIT OF DOUBT TO THE ACCUSED.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant was convicted by the trial court for attempting to murder the complainant by firing a gun at him. The appellant challenged the conviction on the grounds of delay in lodging the first information report, lack of corroborating evidence, and enmity between the parties.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that there was a delay in lodging the first information report and that the witnesses did not support the prosecution case. The court also noted that there was enmity between the parties and that the appellant and his co-accused had been named out of enmity or suspicion.

Issues: 1. Whether the delay in lodging the first information report affected the prosecution case. 2. Whether the lack of corroborating evidence weakened the prosecution case. 3. Whether the enmity between the parties affected the credibility of the witnesses.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the delay in lodging the first information report, the lack of corroborating evidence, and the enmity between the parties raised doubts about the prosecution case. The court gave the benefit of doubt to the appellant and acquitted him of the charge.

Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, and the appellant was acquitted of the charge under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code.

Judgment

K. P. S. Sandhu, J.

1. Achhar Singh appellant has by way of this appeal challenged the order of the Additional Sessions Judge Barnala dated 26th August, 1983, convicting and sentencing him to rigorous imprisonment for two years and a fine of Rs.200, in default further rigorous imprisonment for two months, under Sec.307 of the Indian Penal Code. Two co-accused of the appellant, namely, Gurdev Singh and Bant Singh were given the benefit of doubt by the learned trial Judge and acquitted.

2. Pritam Singh injured P. W.2 jointly owned land with his cousin Bachan Singh. A year and a half before the present occurrence Bachan Singh died. Bachan Singh did not leave behind any issue or widow. His share of the lane was cultivated after his death by Pritam Singh P. W. Charan Kaur daughter of Bant Singh co-accused of the appellant and one Gurmel Kaur daughter-in-law of Dalip Singh were claiming title to the land of Bachan Singh aforesaid on the basis of some will. There was civil litigation pending between the parties. About 11/2 months prior to the present occurrence Bhura Singh brother of Pritam Singh received some injuries, for which Gurdev Singh, Bant Singh co-accused of the appellant and one Jagga Singh brother of the appellant were being prosecuted.

3. On 4th February, 1982, at about 8.30 pm. Pritam Singh injured, his brother Bhura Singh P. W. not examined) and Shrimati Dalip Kaur P. W. wife of Bhura Singh were present in the house of Bhura Singh. Pritam Singh went in the compound to urinate when he noted the appellant and his two co-accused standing on the roof of the house. It was a moonlit night. He called Bhura Singh and his wife Dalip Kaur. The co-accused of the appellant exhorted him to fire at Pritam Singh. Achhar Singh fired a shot from his gun hitting Pritam Singh on various parts of his body. The appellant and his co-accused left the place after jumping from the back side of the house. Bahadur Singh P. W. (given UP) also came in the house of Pritam Singh. Pritam Singh was removed by Dalip Kaur in a jeep to Civil Hospital, Barnala, where he was medically examined by Dr. Vljay Kumar Sobat P. W.1 on 5th February, 1982, at about 0.10 a. m. He found the following injuries: 1. Lacerated wound 0.5 cm x 0.25 cm X skin deep with upper margins grazed, 3 cm below the knee joint on the front of right leg. Slight oozing was present. One pellet was removed from the lower part of the wound.2. Lacerated wound 0.5 cm X 0.25 cm x skin deep on the lateral side of right knee joint, 8 cm above and laterally from injury No.1 Slight oozing was present and the upper margins were grazed.3. Three lacerated wound 0,5 cm X 0.25 cm X skin deep each on the front ofright thigh in the middle in an area of 5 cm X 2 cm. Slight oozing was present. Upper margins were grazed.1 pellet was removed fro m one of the wounds. Lacerated wound 0.5 cm x 0.25 cm x skin deep on the front of right thigh 7 cm above injury No.3. Slight oozing was present. Upper margins were grazed. Three lacerated wound 0.5 cm X 0.25 cm X skin deep each in an area of 10 cm X 6 cm on the upper part of right thigh near the anterior iliac spine. Upper margins were grazed. Slight oozing was present. Lacerated wound 0.5 cm x 0.25 cm x skin deep on the front of abdomen 2 cm below and to the right side of umbilicus. Upper murgins were grazed. Slight oozing was present. Lacerated wound 0.5 cm x 0.25 cm x skin deep on the front of the right side of abdomen, 3.5 cm below the costal margin. Upper margins were grazed. Slight oozing was present. Lacerated wound 0.5 cm x 0.25 cm x skin deep on the dorsum of right hand in between thumb and index finger. Slight oozing was present. Lacerated wound 0.5 x 0.25 cm x skin deep on the palmer surface of right hand in the upper part. According to the doctor, all the injuries were simple in nature and were caused with a firearm within six hours. On receipt of ruqa Exhibit PB from the doctor, Assistant Sub-Inspector Makhan Singh reached the Barnala hospital o





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top