SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(P&H) 288

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
M.R.Sharma and Pritpal Singh JJ.
Devinder Singh
Versus
State Of Punjab
Criminal Appeal No. 756 of 1983,
Decided On : APRIL 24, 1984

In a murder case, the prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed the crime. An alibi defense may be raised by the accused, but it must be supported by credible evidence.

Headnote:

CRIMINAL APPEAL - SECTION 302/34, 302/1, INDIAN PENAL CODE - [SUMMARY] The court upheld the conviction of Puran Singh for the murder of Baljinder Singh, but acquitted his brother Devinder Singh due to lack of evidence.

Fact of the Case:

Puran Singh and Devinder Singh were convicted of murdering Baljinder Singh. Puran Singh claimed alibi, while Devinder Singh claimed he only caught hold of the deceased while Puran Singh inflicted the fatal knife blows.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the prosecution evidence against Puran Singh was strong and reliable, while the alibi defense was not convincing. The court also found that there was reasonable doubt about Devinder Singh's involvement in the murder.

Issues: 1. Whether the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that Puran Singh committed the murder? 2. Whether the alibi defense raised by Puran Singh was credible? 3. Whether Devinder Singh was guilty of murder as an accomplice?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that the eyewitness testimony of Ajit Singh and Kuldip Singh, coupled with the medical evidence, was sufficient to establish Puran Singh's guilt beyond reasonable doubt. 2. The court found that the alibi defense raised by Puran Singh was not convincing, as the witnesses were either related to him or employed by him. 3. The court held that there was reasonable doubt about Devinder Singh's involvement in the murder, as there was no evidence that he had any motive to harm the deceased.

Final Decision: The court upheld the conviction of Puran Singh for murder and sentenced him to life imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 5000. The court acquitted Devinder Singh due to lack of evidence.

Judgment

Pritpal Singh, J.

1. Devinder Singh and Puran Singh residents of village Qila Desa Singh in district Gurdaspur, who are brothers, have filed an appeal against the judgment of the learned Sessions Judge, Gurdaspur, dated November 12, 1983, by which they were convicted and sentenced as under:

2. The complainant Ajit Singh (PW 2) has also filed Criminal Revision No.203 of 1984 claiming compensation from the appellants. The appeal and the revision have arisen from the same judgment and are, therefore, being disposed of together.

3. The prosecution case briefly stated is that Ajit Singh (PW 2) of village Qila Desa Singh and his brother Kabul Singh purchased land from one Guljit Kaur on March 15, 1982 which was under cultivation of Puran Singh appellant. Since Ajit Singh wanted the land to be vacated by Puran Singh it led to inimical relations between them. A civil litigation started between the parties. Puran Singh appellant and Baljinuer Singh deceased son of Ajit Singh (PW 2) were also involved in security proceedings on June 27, 1952. There was Bhog of Akhand Path in the house of Dharam Singh, father-in-law of the deceased Baljinder Singh on October 24, 1982 in village Ghani-ke-Banger. The deceased Baljinder Singh, his father Ajit Singh (PW 2) and his sisters husband Kuldip Singh (PW 3) had gone there to attend the same. After the Bhog ceremony they started the return journey in a tractor and reached bus stand of village Kala Afghana at about 4.50 p m. At the bus stand the deceased Baljinder Singh alighted from the tractor to drink water. He was accosted by the appellants. At that time Puran Singh was holding a knife but Devinder Singh was unarmed. The latter caught hold of Baljinder Singh, whereas Puran Singh, gave three knife blows to him: two on the left flank and third on the forehead. On receipt of these injuries Baljinder Singh died at the spot. The appellants fled away. Ajit Singh (PW 2) went to Police Station Fatehgarh Churian which is 8 Kms. from the place of occurrence and lodged the First Information Report (Exhibit P0) at 6.40 p. m. which was recorded by Sub-Inspector Resham Singh (PW 5 ). The special report reached the Ilaqa Magistrate at Batala at 8.00 p. m. The Sub Inspector went to the place of occurrence and prepared the inquest report (Exhibit PC ). The appellants were arrested on 26th of October, 1982. A knife (Exhibit P.7) was recovered in pursuance of the disclosure of Devinder Singh appellant.

4. The autopsy on the dead body of Baljinder Singh was performed by Dr. Parminder Singh (PW 1) who found the following injures thereon: 1. An incised wound 2 cm x 2 cm on the left side of forehead, 2 cm. above the left eye-brow Name of the appellant Convicted Under Section Sentences awarded Puran Sing 302/i. P. C Imprisonment for life Devinder Singh 302/34,i. P. C Imprisonment for life skin deep 2. An abrasion 0.5 cm. X 0.5 cm. on the bridge of nose 3. An incised wound 2 cm X 1.5 cm. on the left side of chest on the lateral surface, 5.5 cm lateral to the left nipple and 2 cm below it. Vertically placed.4. An incised would 1.5 cm. X 1 cm. on the left side of chest 4.5 cm. below the injury No.3 and 9.5 cm away from the left nipple.

5. Two abrasions 3 cm X 1 cm. and 2 cm X 1 cm on the front and medial aspect of left knee joint respectively.

6. An abrasion 3.5 cm. X 1 cm. on the medial side of left leg, 3 cm. below the left knee joint.

7. An abrasion 2 cm X 1 cm on the front of right leg, 4 cm below the right knee joint The doctor opined that the injuries suffered by the deceased were sufficient to cause death in the ordinary course oft nature.5. During investigation Puran Singh raised plea of alibi which found favour with the Police. Consequently, only Devinder Singh appellant was challaned. The name of Puran Singh was incorporated in column No.2. However, Puran Singh was also later summoned 81 an accused by the trial Court.6. The prosecution case was supported by the eye-witnesses Ajit Singh (PW 2) and Kuldip Si





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top