SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(P&H) 289

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
S.S.Sodhi, J.
Bhagwan Dass Bhatia
Versus
Anand Pal
First Appeal First Order No. 35 of 1979,
Decided On : APRIL 24, 1984

A housewife's services are of economic value and that the pecuniary benefit from these services should be assessed on the totality of all circumstances.

Headnote:

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1939 - SECTION 110A - COMPENSATION - ENHANCEMENT - PECUNIARY LOSS - HOUSEWIFE - SERVICES RENDERED - GRATUITY - MULTIPLICANT - INTEREST - LIABILITY OF OWNER - INSURANCE.

Fact of the Case:

The deceased, Smt. Shanti Devi, was killed in an accident with a tractor. The Tribunal awarded Rs. 6000.00 as compensation to the claimants, her husband and children. The claimants appealed, seeking enhancement of compensation.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the accident was caused by the rash and negligent driving of the tractor driver. The court also found that the deceased was a housewife who provided gratuitous services to her husband and children. The court held that the pecuniary loss suffered by the claimants included the cost of replacing these services.

Issues: 1. Whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal was adequate. 2. Whether the claimants were entitled to compensation for the loss of services provided by the deceased.

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that the compensation awarded by the Tribunal was inadequate. The court considered the various heads of pecuniary loss that could arise for the husband and children on the death of the wife, as catalogued in Kemp and Kemp on Quantum of Damages. The court held that the cost of alternative domestic help and for other incidental matters like tailoring children's clothes and other odd jobs that the deceased was doing in the house, could not be less than Rs. 2500.00 per annum. 2. The court held that the claimants were entitled to compensation for the loss of services provided by the deceased. The court held that a housewife's services are of economic value and that the pecuniary benefit from these services should be assessed on the totality of all circumstances.

Final Decision: The court enhanced the compensation awarded to the claimants to Rs. 30,000.00, with interest at the rate of 12 percent per annum from the date of the application to the date of payment. The court also held that the liability for the amount awarded would be that of the owner of the tractor, as the tractor was not insured at the time of the accident.

Judgment

1. The claim here is by the husband and children of Smt. Shanti Devi, deceased, who was killed in an accident with a tractor on Sept. 11, 1976. This happened at Hansi. It is said that the deceased was run over and killed by a tractor coming from the opposite direction, which came on to the wrong side of the road and knocked her down. It was the finding of the Tribunal that this accident had been caused by the rash and negligent driving of the driver of the tractor. A sum of Rs. 6000.00 was awarded as compensation to the claimants. Enhancement of compensation is the claim in appeal.

2. The pecuniary loss that a husband and children usually suffer in such a case comprises the loss of services that the deceased provided to them gratuitously. The measure of this loss being the cost of replacing these services.

3. In dealing with the matter relating to the claim for compensation arising from the death of the wile the Pi vision Bench of the High Court of Gujrat in Khodabhai Bhagwanbhai V/s. Hirji Tapu, 1980 ACJ 237 : (AIR 1980 Guj 25), referred to Kemp and Kemp on Quantum of Damages, Volume I where the various heads of pecuniary loss which could arise for the husband on the death of his wife were catalogued. These being :-

(1) Loss of wife s contributions to the household from her own earnings.

(2) Expenses of employing a housekeeper or servant to perform services which the wife had rendered gratuitously.

(3) Expenses of providing boarding and lodging for such housekeeper or servant.

(4) Additional expenses caused by having the household run by housekeeper or servant instead of the wife.

(5) Expense of furnishing the room and providing requisite amenities for the housekeeper or servant.

(6) Expense of sending children away to boarding school.

(7) Expense of buying children s clothes instead of having them made by wife.

(8) Expense of having his own clothes, etc. mended instead of having them cared for and mended by wife.

(9) Having to eat meals out instead of having them cooked by the wife.

(10) Loss of element of security where husband s employment was insecure, or his health bad, and where wife had been accustomed to go out to work to keep the home going when the husband was not working.

The Court went on to observe, "thus all these facts have got to be kept in view while determining the damages on account of the untimely death of the wife and then the economic loss is to be ascertained for those who are left behind. Under the circumstances, it is not as if that the accidental death of a non-earning wife means nothing to her dependants and other family members and the economic loss to them would be practically nil as assumed by the Tribunal in the present ease If the deceased wife was earning then her earning would certainly be considered for computing the net economic loss to her family members. But, even if she was not earning, the gratuitous services rendered by her would now be required to be substituted by other modes which will have their own economic importance and value and that the pecuniary benefit from these services in the domestic front as well as in the agricultural operation of the husband when the wife may have acted as a helpful hand as in the present case will have to be assessed on the totality of all circumstances and a proper figure of multiplicant has to be arrived at, and having considered the relative ages of the wife and the husband and the dependants a proper multiplier has to be adopted."

4. There is no retirement age for a house wife. She works in the house for as long as she is physically capable of doing so. Old ladies working in the house are a common feature in our society. It is to be assumed, therefore, that the deceased would have continued to provide services to her husband and children up to an age even extending beyond attaining the age of 65 years as it has come on record, that she was 53-54 years of age at the time of her death and was in good health. She left behind her husband, thr


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top