SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(P&H) 319

RAJENDRA NATH MITTAL, M.M.PUNCHHI
Punjab Concast Steels Ltd. , Ludhiana – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Corporation, Ludhiana – Respondent


Judgment

RAJENDRA NATH MITTAL, J.

1. Briefly the facts are that the petitioner is a Public Limited Company and is manufacturing steel ingots and other alloy and mild steels. It is the owner of property No. B-XXX/939 located at Focal Point, Ludhiana which is in its self-occupation. No part of the building has been let out to anyone. The Municipal Corporation (hereinafter called "the Corporation") in 1973-74 assessed the rateable value of the building at Rs. 1,25,460.00 on which the amount of tax came to Rs. 15,795/-. From 1975 to 1977 the Corporation maintained the same rateable value of the building and assessed the same amount of tax as was done by it in 1973-74. In 1977-78 the rateable value of the building was proposed to be enhanced to Rs. 2,29,99/- by the Corporation. The petitioner filed objections against the proposed rateable value. It is alleged that the matter was compromised between the parties and the building was assessed at rateable value of Rs. 1,30,000.00 .

2. In the year 1980-81 the petitioner was served with a notice on behalf of the Corporation that the rateable value of the property was proposed to be enhanced to Rs. 2,61,700.00 under Sec.103 of the Punjab Munici




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top