Rajendra Nath Mittal, J.

1. This revision petition has been filed by the landlord against the order of the Appellate Authority, Bhatinda dated 26th March, 1982.

2. Briefly the facts are that the petitioner/landlord gave the building i dispute on lease to Faqir Chand Respondent No. 1 on an annual rent of Rs. 1650/-. He made an application for ejectment of respondent No. 1 on the ground that respondent No. 1 had not paid the arrears of rent since 18th December, 1976, that respondent No. 1 had sublet a part of the building to respondents Nos. 2 and 3, that respondents No. 1 had effected material alternations in the building which had materially impaired its value and utility and that he required the building bona fide for his own use and occupation. The application was contested by the respondents who controverted the allegations of the applicant.

3. The Rent Controller held that the applicant did not plead all the ingredients mentioned in section 13(3)(a)(i) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act (hereinafter called the Act), that he bona fide required the premises in dispute for his own use and occupation, that the building had been sublet with the consent of the land