SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(P&H) 437

P.C.JAIN, SURINDER SINGH
Om Parkash – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

P.C.Jain, J.

1. The petitioner is the owner of land measuring 16 Kanals comprised in Khasra No. 10 (8 Kanals 0 Marla and 11 (8 Kanals 0 Marla) of Rectangle No. 31 situate in the revenue estate of Ratgal, Tehsil Thanesar, District Kurukshetra. Originally, the petitioner was the owner of 176 Kanals of land in this village out of which 160 Kanals had been acquired by the State from time to time and he is left with only the aforesaid 16 Kanals of land which is in his possession. The petitioner submitted an application to the Director, Town and Country Planning Department, Haryana, under the Controlled Areas Act for permitting him to use the aforesaid lands for residential purposes, but the prayer was declined and his appeal to the Director was also rejected.

2. It is further averred in the petition that the State of Haryana issued a notification No. LAC(P)-72/NTLA/2124, dated 3rd November, 1972, published in the Haryana Government Gazette (Extraordinary) dated 3rd November, 1972, under section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) in respect of 3000 acres of land situated in villages Bazidpur, Bir Pipli, Pipli, Devidaspura, Umri, Palwal, Sunde





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top