SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(P&H) 410

RAJENDRA NATH MITTAL
Raminder Singh – Appellant
Versus
Sham Lal – Respondent


Judgment

1. This is a second appeal by defendants Nos. 2 and 3 against the judgment and decree of the District Judge, Chandigarh, dt. 19th May, 1975.

2. Briefly, the facts are that Mehar Singh defendant No. 1 was the owner of two houses situated in Mani Majra, which were under mortgage with Jagir Singh defendant No. 3 for a sum of 3,000.00 . Ire entered into an agreement to sell the houses with Raminder Singh defendant No. 2 vide agreement deed dt. 27th December, 1970 (Exhibit D-1). Later, an 3rd January, 1971, he made an agreement for sale of the said houses with the plaintiff for a sum of 4,800.00 . The agreement to sell is Exhibit P. 7. Out of the consideration amount of Rs. 300.00 was paid by the plaintiff as advance to him. Out of the balance. a sums of Rs 3,000.00 was to be paid by the plaintiff to the mortgagee and Rs. 1500.00 to defendant No. 1 at the time of execution of the sale deed which was to be got executed within one week. On 5th January, 1971, a sale deed was executed by defendant No. 1 in his favour on a judicial stamp paper of Rupees 300.00 and was presented before the Sub-Registrar. Jagir Singh raised an objection before the Sub-Registrar that defendant No. 1 had















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top