1983 Supreme(P&H) 336
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
S.P.Goyal, J.
Baldev Krishan
Versus
Chander Deep Jain
First Appeal First Order No. 450 of 1981,
Decided On : AUGUST 5, 1983
The driver of a vehicle who wants to cross or enter the main road of a sector from a bye-lane has to take all the precautions for the safety of the person on the main road before attempting to cross it.
Headnote:
MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT - COMPENSATION - INJURIES SUSTAINED BY THE CLAIMANT - CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE - ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGES - INTEREST.
Fact of the Case:
The claimant, Chander Deep Jain, filed a claim for awarding Rs. 13,25,000.00 as compensation for the injuries received by him in an accident. The Tribunal passed the award vide judgment dt. March 30, 1981 in the amount Rs. 1,68,000.00 with interest at the rate of 6 percent per annum from the date of application, i. e. July 9, 1979 which satisfied none of the parties. The owners of the vehicle involved in the accident filed F. A. O. No. 450 and the claimant F. A. O. No. 452 of 1991 against the award and both the appeal shall be disposed of by this judgment.
Finding of the Court:
The accident took place entirely because of the rash and negligent driving of Jaunga by Baldev Krishan. The claimant was absolved of 30 per cent contributory negligence ascribed to him and it was held that the accident took place entirely because the rash and negligent driving of Baldev Krishan, driver of the Jaunga.
Issues: 1. Whether the claimant Chander Deep suffered injury in the motor vehicle accident caused due to rash and negligent driving of Jaunga Jeep No. HIL 5195 driven by Baldev Krishan, respondent No. 1, or due to the rash and negligent driving of the scooter by the claimant himself? 2. If issue No. 1 is proved, to how much compensation if any, the claimant entitled to and from which of the respondents?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The driver of the Jaunga was guilty of rash and negligent driving while crossing the road dividing sector 9C and 9D. 2. The scooter driver was not guilty of any contributory negligence in causing the accident. 3. The claimant has become more or less a mental wreck, had to leave studies and is incapable of pursuing any professional vocation. 4. The claimant is entitled to Rs. 10,000.00 under the head of special damages, Rs. 20,000.00 under the head of pain and suffering, Rs. 25,000.00 under the head of loss of amenities of life and Rs. 1,92,000.00 under the head of loss of future earnings, totaling Rs. 2,47,000.00.
Final Decision: The appeal, F. A. O. No. 450 of 1981 is dismissed subject to the slight modification mentioned hereafter. The appeal of the claimant. F. A. O. No. 452 of 1981 is partially allowed, the award of the Tribunal modified and the amount of compensation enhanced to Rs. 2,47,000.00 . The claimant shall be entitled to interest at the rate of 12 per cent only on the amount of Rs. 55,000.00 till the date of realization and not on the amount of Rs. 1,92,000.00 awarded on account of the loss of future earnings. The order of the Tribunal allowing interest is accordingly modified. In view of the partial success of the parties, they are left to bear their own costs.
1. Chander Deep Jain filed a claim for awarding Rs. 13,25,000.00 as compensation for the injuries received by him in an accident. However, the Tribunal passed the award vide judgment dt. March 30, 1981 in the amount Rs. 1,68,000.00 with interest at the rate of 6 percent per annum from the date of the application, i. e. July 9, 1979 which satisfied none of the parties. The owners of the vehicle involved in the accident filed F. A. O. No. 450 and the claimant F. A. O. No. 452 of 1991 against the award and both the appeal shall be disposed of by this judgment.
2. On January 12, 1979 at about 11.30 A. M. the claimant was going on Scooter No. CHU 6171 on the road dividing Sector 9C and 9D with his brothel Vipan Kumar Jain sitting on pillion-seat from North towards South, that is, from the shopping centre of Sector 9 toward the Madhya Marg. When he was about 50 yards from the point where this road joins the Madhya Marg, a Jaunga driven by Baldev Krishan came from the right lane at ,a high speed, struck his scooter as a result of which it turned down and both the riders fell on the ground. Chander Deep Jain became immediately unconscious and was removed to the P. G. I. by Baldev Krishan in Jaunga No. HIL 5195. Although he was wearing a helmet but still he suffered fractures of the right frontal temporal and parietal bones. As he was having epileptic fits he was operated upon to remove the blood clot on the right side of his head which was detected upon a spot test. Gradually, his condition improved and he was discharged from the hospital on February 5, 1979. However, as a result of the head injury claimant s memory and intelligence quotient were very badly affected and he became incapable of pursuing further studies. It may be mentioned that when the accident took place he was a student of law at Simla. Consequently he filed the present action before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Chandigarh, alleging that the accident in which he received injuries took place entirely because of the rash and negligent driving of the Jaunga owned by Messrs. Krishna Engineering Works, Factory Area, Patiala, and driven by Baldev Krishan. The National Insurance Company was impleaded as the insurer.
3. Baldev Krishan being one of the partners in the firm which owned the Jaunga, a common written statement was filed on their behalf though a separate written statement was filed by the Insurance Company, yet the pleas taken by both of them were common. The blame for the accident was entirely put on the claimant and in the alternative it was pleaded that he being equally responsible for it was not entitled to any compensation. The allegations regarding the seriousness of the injury, the permanent damage done to the brain as well as the right to compensation were also denied. On the pleadings of the parties, Tribunal framed the following two Issues.
1. Whether the claimant Chander Deep suffered injury in the motor vehicle accident caused due to rash and negligent driving of Jaunga Jeep No. HIL 5195 driven by Baldev Krishan, respondent No. 1, or due to the rash and negligent driving of the scooter by the claimant himself?
2. If issue No. 1 is proved, to how much compensation if any, the claimant entitled to and from which of the respondents?
4. After recording evidence of the parties, under Issue No. 1, the Tribunal held that both the parties were responsible for the accident and ascribed 30 per cent and 70 per cent negligence to the claimant and the driver respectively. Under Issue No. 2, he allowed Rs. 15,000.00 on account of out of pocket expenses, 40,000.00 for pain and suffering, 25,000.00 for disfigurement and loss of marriage prospects and Rs. 2,40,000.00 on account of loss of future earnings, the total being Rs. 3,20,000.00 . This amount reduced by 30 per cent on account he contributory negligence of the claimant and further by another 25 per cent as the amount was being paid in lumpsum. Thus, an award in the amount Rs. 1,68,000.00 was passed