SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(P&H) 342

B.S.YADAV
Ravinder Mohan Bakhshi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

1. The petitioners have filed this petition under Sec. 438 of the Criminal P. C. 1973 (for short the Code) for a direction that in the event of their arrest, they be released on bail. It is not necessary to give all the allegations mentioned in the petition. Suffice it to say that as appears from the petition and the reply filed on behalf of respondent No. 3, a criminal case has been registered in Central Crime Branch. Madras 8, vide First Information Report No. 130 of 1983 against the petitioners and others. The petitioners had applied for anticipatory bail before the Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, who vide his order dt. May 10, 1983, granted bail, subject to the condition that they would get the bail confirmed from the Court of competent jurisdiction within one month from that day. Thereafter the present petition was filed in this Court.

2. During arguments, question arose, whether this Court is competent to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners against whom a case has been registered at Madras at the instance of M/s. Tractor and Farm Equipment Ltd. Madras. The brief facts of that case according to a copy of the complaint filed with the return, are that 19 tractor













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top