SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(P&H) 273

PREM CHAND JAIN, S.P.GOYAL
Commissioner Of Income-tax – Appellant
Versus
Behari Lal Pyare Lal – Respondent


Judgment

S.P.Goyal, J.

1. The assessee-firm was initially formed on September 20, 1958, consisting of Pyare Lal and his two sons, Lachhman Dass and Sat Parkash, as partners. After the death of Pyare Lal, it was reconstituted on February 22, 1960, and Smt. Basanti Devi, his widow, was introduced in his place. Yet another change took place in the constitution of the firm on March 23, 1962, whereby Smt. Basanti Devi retired and Omkar, son of Kishan Chand, was taken as partner with two annas share. During the assessment years 1961-62 and 1962-63 the firm paid Rs. 8,261 on account of sales tax which were ordered to be refunded and on that account a sum of Rs. 4,498 was received by the firm on September 7, 1967, and credited to the account of Lachhman Dass and Sat Parkash in equal shares. This amount was not shown as income of the firm in the assessment year 1968-69 and was included in its income by the assessing authority. Simultaneously, the penalty proceedings for wilful concealment of income were instituted and penalty imposed by the IAC, vide order dated September 21, 1970. However, on appeal, the Tribunal deleted the penalty and on an application by the Commissioner referred the fol





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top