RAJENDRA NATH MITTAL
Mahesh Pal – Appellant
Versus
Desh Raj Singhand – Respondent
1. This second appeal has been filed by Mahesh Pal and Danesh Pal, defendants 1 and 2, against the judgment and decree of the Additional District Judge, Faridabad, D/-9-2-1982.
2. Briefly, the facts are that Sukhi defendant 3 along with Rambula, Tek Chand and Chhida was co-sharer and in possession of agricultural land bearing khewat No. 69, Khasra Nos. 37/8 (8-0), 30/12 (3-8), 30/13 (8-0). 30/14/1 (5-0), 30/18 (8-0), 30/19 (2-18), 36/23 (7-9), 36/24 (4-0), 36/26 (0-12), 37/4/1 (1-0), 37/4/2 (5-11), 37/6 (1-13), 37/7/1 (7-12), 37/7/2 (0-7) and 37/14 (8-0), situated within the revenue limits of village Sotai, Tehsil Ballabhgarh, District Faridabad. The plaintiffs had purchased khasra No. 37/4 out of the above joint khewat of the co-sharers from Rambula, Tek Chand and Chhida vide registered sale deed D/-10-6-1977. Thereafter, Sukhi sold 11/72 Share out of the above khewat to Mahesh pal and Danesh Pal defendants 1 and 2 for a consideration of Rs. 22,000.00 vide sale deed D/-29-3-1979. The plaintiffs claimed that they were co-sharers in the land which was sold by Sukhi defendant in favour of defendants 1 and 2, and, therefore, had a superior right of pre-emption. They also chall
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.