SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(P&H) 85

S.S.SANDHAWALIA, G.C.MITTAL
Sardarni Sampran Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Sant Singh – Respondent


Judgment

S.S.SANDHAWALIA, J.

1. The question posed for determination by the Division Bench in the reference order of the learned single Judge is in the following terms:-

"Whether the ejectment of a person, who is a tenant of a demised premises which is part and parcel of a bigger building, can be ordered, to enable the landlady to reconstruct the dilapidated building if the other portion of the building which is in possession of the landlady is found to be unsafe for human habitation?"

2. At the outset, however, it may be mentioned that the learned counsel for the parties are agreed that the core question here can be more felicitously formulated in general terms as under :-

"Whether a tenant of the demised premises which are an integral part of a larger building can be ejected under the provisions of Section 13(3)(a)(iii) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 , on the ground of the building having become unsafe and unfit for human habitation despite the fact that the particular portion in the occupation of the tenant may not be so."

3. The facts may be delineated with relative brevity with particular reference to the question aforesaid. 3-A. An application under S.13 w








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top