I.S.Tiwana, J.

1. This order would dispose of two revision petitions No. 2150 and 2151 of 1980, filed under Section 15 (6) of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) by the two respondent-landlords against the petitioner-tenants on the same pleas and thus undisputably involve identical questions of law and fact for consideration.

2. Initially the shop in question was rented out by Siri Ram, father of the present respondents to the Delhi Cloth and General Mills, petitioner No. 1. Siri Ram filed an application for the ejectment of the said tenant on the plea that it had sub-let the demised premises to Mam Chand, father of Vinod Kumar petitioner. That application of Siri Ram was dismissed by the Rent Controller and the said order was affirmed by the appellate authority. After the death of Siri Ram and Mam Chand, the present respondents, who as already stated are the sons of Siri Ram, brought these two separate applications under Section 13 of the Act with the same plea that the Delhi Cloth and General Mills, the tenant, had sub-let this property to Vinod Kumar son of Mam Chand. The tenant and the alleged sub lessee in the