S.C.MITAL
Jagtar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
1. The question of law involved in this petition is, whether a surety, whose bond has been forfeited and who is unable to pay the penalty, can be sentenced to imprisonment?
2. The brief facts are that Gambhir Singh was arrested for being in possession of five kilograms of illicit opium. He was allowed to be released on bail in the sum of Rs. 10,000.00 with two like sureties, one of them being Jagtar Singh. Gambhir Singh jumped bail. The surety bond executed by Jagtar Singh was also forfeited and he was directed to pay the full penalty of Rs. 10,000.00 , but Jagtar Singh stated that he did not own any moveable or immoveable property to discharge the liability. In consequence, the Magistrate ordered that the ends of justice would be met, if Jagtar Singh was sentenced to imprisonment for three months R. I. under Section 421 read with Ss. 424 and 446 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The appeal filed by Jagtar Singh was dismissed by the learned Sessions Judge, Patiala. Hence, he has preferred the present revision petition.
3. In order to show that the impugned order is not sustainable, learned counsel for Jagtar Singh pointed out that formerly, sub-section (4) of Secti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.