SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(P&H) 370

I.S.TIWANA
Miss Rattanjit Kaur – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


JudgmentJudgment

1. In this appeal under Section 110-D of the Motor Vehicles Act; 1939, the appellatnt makes a grouse of the inadequacy of the award of Rupees 10,010, made in her favour by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chandigarh under Section 110-B of the Act.

2. Rattanjit Kaur, appellant an unmarried young girl of 26 years of age was employed as a clerk in the Office of the Punjab School Education Board and was drawing Rs. 418.10 P. as her total emoluments on May 30, 1977 the date of accident. She was riding on the pillion seat of the Scooter No. PN3-8909 on her way to her office in Sector 17, Chandigarh. The scooter was being driven by Shri C.D. Kalra. When the scooter reached the crossing of the road near K.C. Cinema, bus No. HRA-9216, driven by Lakhan Pal driver banged into it and as per the evidence on record, the scooter was dragged to a distance of 20 to 25 paces from the place of the impact. As a result of this accident the appellant suffered the following injuries:-

1. Fracture of both bones of the right leg with multiple abrasions.

2. Colle s fracture of the right forearm with multiple abrasions on the forearm right side.

3. Abrasion on the left elbow 3/4" diametre.












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top