SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(P&H) 144

BHOPINDER SINGH DHILLON, G.C.MITTAL
Commissioner Of Income-tax – Appellant
Versus
Ram Narain – Respondent


JudgmentJudgment

B.S.Dhillon, J.

1. The assessees are Shri Ram Narain and his three sons, Sarvshri Puran Mal, Jage Ram and Chander Bhan. Shri Ram Narain had formed a joint Hindu family consisting of himself, his wife and the said three sons. Shri Ram Narain became a partner in the firm, M/s. Ram Narain Chander Bhan, Rohtak Mandi, having 1/4 th share in his capacity as a karta of his HUF. The assessment years under reference are 1967-68 and 1968-69. On 15th November, 1965, there was a partial partition in the family as a result of which 1/4 th share in the said firm was divided equally between five members of the family, each having 1/5 th share. A memorandum of partition was drawn up on 8th November, 1966, according to which the capital standing to the credit of the family in the books of the said firm was also divided into five shares and thenceforward the amounts which fell to the shares of the four members other than Shri Ram Narain were treated as loans from them. Shri Ram Narain made an application for recognition of this partition under Section 171 of the I.T. Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") to the ITO. This application was made during the proceedings for the











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top