J.V.GUPTA
Sarup Chand – Appellant
Versus
Nagar Palika, Sangrur – Respondent
1. The plaintiff-petitioner has filed this revision petition against the order of the trial Court, whereby application under Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, filed behalf of respondent No. 2, Talia Ram, has been allowed.
2. The plaintiff has filed a suit for permanent injunction against Nagar Palika, Sangrur, to the effect that the defendant be restrained from demolishing and breaking the wall, mentioned in the notice dated 11th June, 1979, issued by the defendant. During the pendency of this suit, one Talia Ram filed an application under Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, with the prayer that he be impleaded as a respondent in the suit. His case is that there is one lane shown by letters ABC in the site plan attached and there was a wall in front of this lane which wall was demolished in the year 1978, and any relief granted to the plaintiff in his absence, is likely to affect him adversely, and that he ought to be arrayed as a party so that Court may be able to effectually and completely adjudicate upon and settle all the questions involved in the suit. This application was contested on behalf of the plaintiff and it was stated that he has got
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.