SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(P&H) 107

D.S.TEWATIA, AJIT SINGH, PREM CHAND JAIN
Rajinder Singh Etc. – Appellant
Versus
Kultar Singh – Respondent


Judgment

PREM CHAND JAIN, J.

1. The Punjab Courts (Haryana Amendment) Act, 1977 (Act No. 20 of 1977) and the Punjab Courts (Haryana Amendment) Act, 1978 (Act No. 24 of 1978) were passed by the Haryana State Legislature. By Act No. 20 of 1977, the jurisdictional value of an appeal to the Court of District Judge from a decree or order of a Subordinate Judge was raised to Rs. 20,000/-, while by Act No. 24 of 1978 it was provided that an appeal from a decree or order of a Sub-ordinate Judge shall lie to the District Judge, irrespective of the value of the original suit. Under Act No. 24 of 1978, an amendment was also made in S.41 in order to bring the provisions of that Section in conformity with the provisions of S.100 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The effect of the amendment in S.39 under Act No. 24 of 1978 is that all R.F. As pending in this Court shall stand transferred to the Court of the District Judge.

2. R.F.A. No. 359 of 1971 (Rajinder Singh etc. V/s. Kartar Singh etc.) and R.F.A. No. 67 of 1974 (Punjab Electrical and General Industries (Pvt.) Ltd. V/s. The State Bank of India) were pending decision in this Court. In view of the amendment made by virtue of Act No. 24 of 1978,













































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top