SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(P&H) 64

G.C.MITTAL
Harbans Singh – Appellant
Versus
Chief Settlement Commissioner, Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

1. One Krishan Lal a displaced person was allotted an area of about 508 bighas of evacuee agricultural land in lieu of land left by him in Pakistan. In due course proprietary rights were conferred on him by the Managing Officer and he became full owner thereof. After the conferment of the proprietary rights, Krishan Lal, the original owner, sold his land by various sale deeds from 1957 to 1959 to different vendees. After Krishan Lal had sold the land transferred to him by the Rehabilitation Department to the vendees, it was found by the Rehabilitation Department that his allotment to the extent of 6.13½ standard acres, equal to about 54 bighas and 9 biswas, was in excess and in accordance with law the proprietary rights to the extent of the aforesaid area were cancelled by the Rehabilitation Department. The order of cancellation is not in dispute.

2. As a consequence of the cancellation of the 54 bighas and 9 biswas from the allotment of Krishan Lal, this much area had to be retrieved by the Rehabilitation Department from the vendees as by that time the original owner had sold away the entire allotted area including the area which was found to be in excess.

3. The Rehabilit




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top