SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(P&H) 183

C.G.SURI
Mal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Ram Kaur – Respondent


Judgment

1. A suit filed by the plaintiff-appellants for a declaration of title or in the alternative for possession of the land in dispute was dismissed by the trial court and the first appeal filed by the plaintiffs had also remained unsuccessful. The plaintiffs have therefore, come to this Court in second appeal under Section 100 of the code of the Civil Procedure.

2. Dharam Singh, the first cousin of the plaintiff-appellants was a joint owner with the appellants, of the land in dispute. He owned a half share while the other half share belonged to the appellants. Dharam Singh died on August 28, 1944 and the mutation of succession, copy Exhibit P-7 was attested in favour of Smt. Ram Kaur defendant-respondent who was described as the widow the deceased during those mutation proceedings. The mutation order had been duly attested in favour of the defendant-respondent in an open gathering of the village on December 19, 1946 and there is a note in the register of mutations that the appellants had filed an appeal against that mutation of succession and that this appeal had been dismissed on December 18, 1947.

3. The dispute about succession to Dharam Singhs half share in the land was no








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top