SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(P&H) 201

D.K.MAHAJAN, BAL RAJ TULI, H.R.SODHI
Commissioner Of Gift-tax, Patiala – Appellant
Versus
Taj Nath – Respondent


Judgment

D.K.Mahajan, J.

1. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench "c", referred the following question of law for the opinion of this court:

"Where, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the gifts made by the assessee, who is also karta of the Hindu undivided family, were void ab initio and, therefore, these gifts could not be brought to tax under the Gift-tax Act, 1958 ?

2. This reference was posted before me and Gopal Singh J. for hearing. In view of the conflict of judicial opinion on the question whether the gift by a karta of a Hindu undivided family to coparceners and non-coparceners is void ab initio, we directed that this reference should be heard and decided by a larger Bench. That is how this reference has been placed before the Full Bench.

3. The assessment year in question is 1964-65. The previous year ended on 31st March, 1964. Shri Tej Nath is the assessee. He was assessed as an individual in the year in question (1964-65). The relationship of the donor and the donees is indicated by the following pedigree-table :

Sunder Lal His three wives

(name not known, had predeceased her husband)Kartari Devi (chi









































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top