SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(P&H) 148

D.K.MAHAJAN, H.R.SODHI
Shazada Nand & Sons – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Income-tax – Respondent


Judgment

1. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, has referred the following question of law for our opinion:

"Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the sum of Rs. 45,380 paid to L. Gurandittamal and L. Sahibdiyal, employees of the applicant firm, is permissible deduction in computing the business income of the applicant ? "

2. In order to answer the question, it is necessary to advert to the relevant facts. The assessee is a partnership firm. It holds the sole selling agency of Messrs. Oriental Carpet Manufacturers (India) Private Ltd. in respect of sale of yarn, cloth and blankets manufactured by the said company. The assessee was receiving commission as selling agent and over and above that commission, it started receiving overriding commission at 2 1/2 per cent, on the total sales effected. The overriding commission thus received by the assessee is as follows:

Assessment year

Amount received


1960-61

Rs. 35,964


1961-62

Rs. 61,818


1962-63

Rs. 83,922


1963-64

Rs.1,13,449


3. The turnover of the assessee increased from Rs. 39.99 lakhs during the year relevant to the assessment year 1962-63 to Rs. 54.28 lakhs during the year under consideration, name










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top