SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(P&H) 240

D.K.MAHAJAN, BAL RAJ TULI
Commissioner Of Income-tax – Appellant
Versus
Hans Raj – Respondent


Judgment

1. In order to appreciate the answers which we propose to give to the questions referred to us, it would be proper to set out the relevant undisputed facts in the chronological order. For a proper understanding of the facts, a short genealogical table of the parties may be stated :

Mehtab Shah Jaini

|

_____________________________________________

| | | |

Muni Lal Moti Lal Bhim Sen Hans Raj

(1) (2) (3) (4)

________|______________ _|______________ |___

| | | | | | | |

Manohar Roshan Tilak Dharam Shadi Madan Joginder Sat

Lal Lal Chand pal Lal Lal pal pal

(5) (7) (9) (11) (6)












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top