SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(P&H) 224

H.R.SODHI
Manmohan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Sat Narain – Respondent


Judgment

, J.

1. This revision petition filed by the plaintiff under Sec.115, Code of Civil Procedure, is directed against the order of the Subordinate Judge, 1st Class, Fazilka, who permitted Shri J. R. Aggarwal, an Advocate of Jullundur, to be impleaded as defendant in the suit. The plaintiff is also an Advocate at Jallalabad.

2. It is alleged that Sat Narain, defendant-respondent 1, executed an agreement to sell a vacant plot of land situate in Jallalbad, district Ferozepur, in favour of the plaintiff-petitioner on 13th June, 1964, for an ostensible consideration of Rs.5,500/- out of which Rs.4,500/- were received by him in cash as earnest money and the balance was to be paid at the time of the registration of the sale-deed after meeting the incidental expenses. It may be mentioned that the plot in question was an evacuee property which had been purchased by Sat Narain defendant at an auction sale by the had not obtained the sale certificate when the agreement to sell was entered into. The deed of conveyance by the Rehabilitation Department is supposed to have been executed in his favour on 27th December, 1968, and about two months before that, on 29th October, 1968, he is said t








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top