SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(P&H) 235

Kay Engineering Co. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Income-tax, Patiala – Respondent


Judgment

1. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench "C", has referred the following questions of law to this court for opinion along with the statement of the case:

"1. Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, distribution of assets among the partners in species on the dissolution of the firm amounts to sale or transfer within the meaning of section 10(2) (vib) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922/section 34(3) (b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ?

2. Whether, in view of the provisions of section 10(2) (vic) (ii) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922/section 33(4) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, on the admitted facts and in the circumstances of the case, one-half of the development rebate in respect of machinery and plant which fell to the share of the two partners, A. R. Khosla and Adarsh Bala Khanna, was rightly withdrawn by the Income-tax officer in respect of the assessment years 1959-60 to 1963-64 ?

3. Whether, in respect of the assessment year 1964-65 when the factory worked for the whole year, the Income-tax Officer was legally entitled to disallow development rebate for the year in question on the basis of subsequent events which took place after the close of the acco















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top