SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(P&H) 169

R.S.NARULA
Deva Singh – Appellant
Versus
Kurukshetra University Karnal – Respondent


Judgment

1. Deva Singh petitioner seeks a direction from this Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution annulling the communication of respondent No.2, who is the Head of the Department of Economics in the first respondent University, dated August 31, 1970 (Annexure a tot he writ petition ). Whereby the petitioner was informed that this provisional admission to the M. A. Economics Course could not be made regular and the petitioner could, therefore, apply for the refund of the fees deposited by him. The facts leading to the filing of this petition which are gathered from the various affidavits are gathered from the various affidavits filed by the petitioner as well as the respondent may first be noticed.

2. The petitioner was a B. Sc. (Honours) student in the Kurukshetra University, but could not take that examination in April, 1967, as he ran short of the minimum number of lectures entitling him to appear in the examination. In a situation like this, the relevant regulations of the University permitted him to join, as a casual student, the three terms of the next session, i. e. , July to September , October to December, 1967,, and January to April , 1968. He joined and c













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top