1. This is a petition under sub-section (5) of S.15 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restrict Act (3 of 1949) (hereinafter called the Act) against the order of Shri Ved Parkash Sharma, Appellate Authority, Faridkot dated March, 3, 1969 setting aside the order of the Rent Controller after allowing the present respondents leave to amend their original written statement so as to take up a new plea to the effect that no notice terminating their tenancy having been served on them under Sec.106 of the Transfer of Property Act, the application of the petitioners was liable to be dismissed.

2. Mr. Bhagat Singh Chawla, the learned counsel for the respondents, has raised a preliminary objection to the effect that no petition for revision of an order of the rent control authorities allowing an amendment of a pleading under Order 6, Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure lies to this Court as such an order is not "an order passed under this Act" within the meaning of that expression used in Sec.16 (5) of the Act. Sub-section (5) of S.15 is in the following terms:" the High Court may, at any time, on the application of any aggrieved party or on its own motion, call for and examine the reco