SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(P&H) 43

D.K.MAHAJAN, S.S.SANDHAWALIA
Naunihal Thakar Dass – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Income-tax – Respondent


Judgment

D.K.Mahajan, J.

1. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench "B", has referred the following question of law for our opinion under Section 66(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 (hereinafter referred to as the Act):

"Whether the assessee is entitled to the claim of Rs. 977 as interest paid in the year 1960-61 and Rs. 1,148 in the assessment year 1961-62 in the circumstances narrated above ?"

2. The circumstances that have been narrated by the Tribunal may now be stated : Naunihal and his two sons, Parshotam Singh and Iqbal Singh, constituted a registered firm. Naunihal had sufficient credit balance in his capital account and he issued instructions that the following sums be transferred to his daughter and daughters-in-law. Smt. Kamal Kumari is the daughter and Smt. Simla Devi and Smt. Tripta Devi are daughters-in-law, the former being the wife of Parshotam Singh and the latter being the wife of Iqbal Singh. A sum of Rs. 9,500 was gifted to Smt. Kamal Kumari and Rs. 4,500 each to the two daughters-in-law. The method adopted was that these amounts were debited in the books of account of the registered firm and were credited in the names of these three ladies. On these



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top