SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(P&H) 62

MEHAR SINGH, R.S.NARULA
Commissioner Of Wealth-tax – Appellant
Versus
Sheela Devi – Respondent


Judgment

R.S.Narula, J.

1. The circumstances in which the following question of law has been referred to this court by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench "A", at the instance of the Commissioner of Wealth-tax, Punjab, Patiala, under Section 27(1) of the Wealth-tax Act (27 of 1957) (hereinafter called "the Act"), may first be noticed :

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the two lands in question were agricultural lands within the meaning of Section 2(e)(i) of the Act on the valuation date ?"

2. Shrimati Sheela Devi, respondent, hereinafter referred to as the assesses, owned two plots of land on either side (one on the east and the other on the west) of the central plot which originally belonged to her but had been sold by her earlier to the Government for establishment of Government postal colony. The relevant assessment year is 1961-62, and the relevant valuation date is March 31, 1961. The pivotal question around which the present dispute revolves is whether on the valuation date these two plots of land were or were not agricultural land within the meaning of Section 2(e)(i) of the Act. If those were agricultural land, as held by the Tribunal,






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top