SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(P&H) 41

PREM CHAND JAIN
Mukhtiar Singh Etc. – Appellant
Versus
Tehal Singh Etc. – Respondent


Judgment

Prem Chand Jain, J.

1. The brief facts of the case are that Ragga Singh and his brother Phula Singh sold the land in dispute to defendants 3 to 8 for a consideration of Rs. 15,000/- by means of sale deed dated 9th June, 1958. Tehal Singh son of Ragga Singh brought the usual declaratory suit alleging that the land in suit was ancestral and sale being without any legal necessity, would not affect his reversionary rights. The suit was contested by the vendee-defendants of several pleas.

2. After the filing of the written statement, the plaintiff filed an application under Order 6, Rule 17 and Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code, on 15th November, 1968, praying for the amendment of the plaint. The exact amendment that was sought to be made, is in the following terms :-

"That the plaintiff was born at the time of sale and at the time of institution of the plaint the plaintiff was 20 years of his age. Plaintiff has right to sue till the age of 21. Therefore suit is within time."

3. The application was opposed by the defendant-vendees and was ultimately dismissed by the trial Court on 22nd November, 1968. Consequently the suit was also dismissed on the ground that it was barre












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top