SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(P&H) 171

PREM CHAND PANDIT
Shrimati Raj Kumari – Appellant
Versus
Shadi Lal – Respondent


Judgment

Prem Chand Pandit, J.

1. This is landlords revision petition against the decision of the appellant authority confirming on appeal the order of the Rent Controller dismissing her application for the eviction of the tenant.

2. Shrimati Raj Kumari owns the house in dispute which is situate in Ludhiana City. She had given its ground floor on a monthly rent of Rs. 60/- to Shadi Lal, the first floor being occupied by herself. The landlord filed an application for the ejectment of the tenant under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, (hereinafter called the Act) on number of grounds, but we are, in the present revision petition, concerned with only one of them, namely, that the entire building was in a dangerous condition and unfit for human habitation. The Rent Controller, after discussing the evidence produced in the case, came to the conclusion that the landlord had failed to establish that ground. He was of the view that building was repairable and could be set right. The ejectment application was, consequently, dismissed.

3. Aggrieved by that order, the landlord went in appeal before the appellant authority. He was of the opinion that although the landlor







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top