SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(P&H) 44

SHAMSHER BAHADUR, MEHAR SINGH
R. N. Oswal Hosiery And Mahabir Woollen Mills – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Income-tax, Punjab – Respondent


JudgmentJudgment

SHAMSHER BHADUR, J.

1. The question which fall for determination in the reference made to this court under sub-section (1) of section 66 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 (hereinafter called the Act) are these :

"(1) Whether two partnership firms having common partners and identical shares are as a matter of law one ?

(2) If yes, whether the income earned by such two firms is to be assessed collectively ?"

2. The first question as framed is manifestly one of law and not dependent on the facts but it would be necessary to have a background of the circumstances in which the reference at the instance of the applicant has been made by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi.

3. The assessments in respect of which appeals were pending before the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal relate to 1958-59 and 1959-60, the previous years ending with 31st March, 1958, and 31st March, 1959, respectively. The applicant is R. N. Oswal Hosiery and Mahabir Woollen Mills, Ludhiana, which formed itself into a partnership under a document of 6th of April, 1953, consisting of five partners, each entitled to one-fifth share. Another partnership consisting of the same five partners with the sam


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top