PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Tek Chand, J.
Malerkotla Power Supply Company
Versus
Excise And Taxation Officer
Civil Writ No. 2210 of 1964,
Decided On : MAY 1, 1968
ELECTRICITY - GOODS - REGISTRATION - CENTRAL SALES TAX ACT, 1956 - PUNJAB GENERAL SALES TAX ACT, 1948 - ELECTRICITY IS "GOODS" WITHIN THE MEANING OF BOTH THE ACTS - PETITIONER IS ENTITLED TO BE REGISTERED AS A DEALER.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, M/s. Malerkotla Power Supply Company, was denied registration as a dealer under the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948, and the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, on the ground that electricity, which was the subject of its business, was not "goods" within the meaning of the Acts.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that electricity is "goods" within the meaning of both the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948, and the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, and that the petitioner was entitled to be registered as a dealer under the law.
Issues: Whether electricity is "goods" within the meaning of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948, and the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the definitions of "goods" in both Acts, which are identical and define "goods" as "all kinds of movable property other than newspapers, actionable claims, stocks, shares or securities," and on the fact that electricity is a movable property that can be stored, transmitted, and measured.
Final Decision: The court allowed the petition and quashed the impugned orders denying the petitioner's registration as a dealer. The court directed the Excise and Taxation Officer, Sangrur, to dispose of the petitioner's application for registration in light of the court's observations.
Tek Chand, J.
1. This is a writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India on behalf of M/s. Malerkotla Power Supply Company through its proprietor Shri Bhagwan Dass against the Excise and Taxation Officer, Sangrur, the Excise and Taxation Commissioner, Punjab, and the State of Punjab, praying for issuance of an appropriate writ quashing the impugned orders of the Excise and Taxation Officer, Sangrur, and the Assistant Excise and Taxation Commissioner, Punjab, vide annexures D and F respectively.
2. The facts giving rise to this case are that Shri Bhagwan Dass was the sole owner of the Malerkotla Power Supply Company which supplies electricity which was made available to him by the Punjab State Electricity Board at 400 voltage and the petitioner-company in turn sells the same to its consumers and charges for the energy consumed. Under the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, electricity was free from sales tax. Shri Bhagwan Dass owned another concern called M/s. B. D. Brothers, Malerkotla, which dealt with electrical goods and appliances. Under the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, both these concerns had two separate certificates of registration in Form S.T. III. The sales tax numbers of these concerns were BAR III 2550 and BAR III 1924 respectively. Later on, the authorities decided that there should be one certificate of registration as Shri Bhagwan Dass was the proprietor of both the concerns and that it should be in Form S.T. IV as prescribed by Rule 5 of the Punjab General Sales Tax Rules.
3. On 1st of April, 1962, Shri Bhagwan Dass gifted his entire business which he was running under the name and style of M/s. B. D. Brothers, Malerkotla, to his son Shri Chaman Lal and his grandson Shri Prem Kumar in equal shares. Consequently he had to surrender the registration certificate No. BAR IV 1929 for having it amended in Form S.T. III. On 10th of April, 1962, he made an application submitting that since he had gifted M/s. B. D. Brothers, Malerkotla, to his son and grandson, his registration certificate No. RC BAR IV 1929 be converted into S.T. Ill in respect of M/s. Malerkotla Power Supply Company. One application was for registration under the Punjab General Sales Tax Act and the second under the Central Sales Tax Act, vide copies annexures A and B. Finally, M/s. B. D. Brothers, Malerkotla, were given a separate registration number both under the Punjab General Sales Tax Act and the Central Sales Tax Act. The petitioners application dated 1st of April, 1962, remained pending without a final decision having been communicated to him.
4. On 30th of December, 1963, the petitioner again made an application for the registration of Iris concern under both the Acts. This application was made to the Assistant Excise and Taxation Officer. The petitioner was orally informed that his earlier registration number in Form S.T. IV had been cancelled and that he should make a fresh application. He then submitted a new application which is on a printed form, vide copy annexure C. Shri G. K. Bhalla, Excise and Taxation Officer, Sangrur, rejected the application by his order dated 10th of January, 1964, vide annexure D, for the reason that M/s. Malerkotla Power Supply Company dealt exclusively in the distribution of electricity which was not "goods" as had been held by the Excise and Taxation Commissioner in the case of Kumar Textile Mills, Amritsar. A copy of that order has been filed, vide annexure E. The petitioner filed a revision from the order of Shri G. K. Bhalla. It was heard by the Assistant Excise and Taxation Commissioner, Punjab, who by his order dated 26th of March, 1964, rejected the revision, vide annexure F. The reason given was that the electricity had been held not to be "goods" within the meaning of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act by the Excise and Taxation Commissioner in the case of Kumar Textile Mills, Amritsar, referred to above. The contention of the petitioner is that under Section 7 of the Central Sales
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.