SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(P&H) 15

MEHAR SINGH, R.S.NARULA
Sohan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Achhar Singh – Respondent


Judgment

R.S.Narula, J.

1. In village Cheema Khurd, Tehsil Patti, District Amritsar, there is a Dharamsala by the name of Baby Nanga. Sohan Singh appellant was its manager Achhar Singh and four others respondents before us, claiming to be worshippers of the said shrine, filed a suit in May, 1954, under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure (after having obtained the requisite sanction of the Advocate-General, Pun-jab) for the removal of the appellant, for his eviction from the shrine and the property attach-ed thereto, as well as for rendition of accounts The grounds on which the said relief was claim ed were enumerated in paragraph 3 of the plaint, which would, on being translated into English, read as follows:-

-

(i) The behaviour of Sohan Singh manager, the defendant mentioned in the heading of this plaint, has considerably worsened for some time and he does not properly look after the affairs of the said Dharamsala, nor does he properly behave with the persons who visit the aforesaid Dhararnsala lor purposes of worship, nor he keeps the langar (free kitchen), etc., running for the visitors for which purpose the said agricultural land was donated and the income thereof was to






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top