SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(P&H) 92

SHAMSHER BAHADUR, P.C.PANDIT
Tek Chand Preemptor – Appellant
Versus
Sain Dass – Respondent


Judgment

Shamsher Bahadur, J.

1. This judgment will dispose of three Letters Patent appeals, L.P. As Nos. 122 to 124 of 1963, arising out of three pre-emption suits in respect of three separate sales, one on 21st of February, 1958 and two on 9th of April, 1958, by Nabh Ram the fourth respondent, in favour of Sain Dass (L.P.A. No. 122 of 1963) Human Woollen Rain Mills L.P.A. 123 of 1963) and Damodar Dass and others L.P.A. 124 of 1963). It is common ground that in all these three plots measuring 4512, 4526 and 4584 yards a growing orchard was cut down and the trees uprooted and the land levelled for sale in plots for industrial purposes. Three separate suits were filed for pre-emption on 7th of April, 1959, by Tek Chand and his brother claiming as the nephews (brothers sons) of the vendor.

2. In the three suits which came to be consolidated, the pleas taken in the written statement of the defendant-vendees were that the property sold did not constitute land to enable the plaintiffs to file a suit for pre-emption on ground of relationship. It was not denied that the land had originally been an orchard and the trees had been cut down. It was, however, pleaded that a sum of about one lak
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top