SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(P&H) 110

D.K.MAHAJAN
Sadhu Singh – Appellant
Versus
Punjab Roadways, Ambala City – Respondent


Judgment

D.K.Mahajan, J.

1. This appeal must succeed in view of the decision of the Madras High Court in Jerome DSilva V/s. The Regional Transport Authority, South Kanara, AIR 1952 Mad 853 and P. Channappa V/s. Mysore Revenue Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore, 1966 0 CrLJ 265. In both these cases it has been held that the judgment of the Criminal Court is binding so far as statutory Tribunals are concerned. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, constituted under the Motor Vehicles Act, is such a Tribunal and was so held by the learned Chief Justice in AIR 1952 Mad 853. The Tribunal has given a complete go-by to the judgment of the Criminal Court where the driver of the offending vehicle was convicted and sentenced for the death of the petitioners son.

2. In this view of the matter, I allow this appeal, set aside the order of the Claims Tribunal and remit the case to him to determine the amount of compensation payable to the petitioner. The cost will be costs in the cause.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top