PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
D.K.Mahajan and R.S.Narula JJ.
Surjan Singh
Versus
Harcharan Singh
Second Appeal No. 25A of 1965,
Decided On : FEBRUARY 8, 1967
PRE-EMPTION - BROTHER - STEP-BROTHER - PUNJAB PRE-EMPTION ACT, 1913 - SECTION 15(1)(A) SECONDLY - INTERPRETATION - WHETHER STEP-BROTHER INCLUDED IN THE TERM BROTHER - HELD, NO.
Fact of the Case:
The sole issue in this appeal was whether the term "brother" in Section 15(1)(a) secondly of the Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913, included a step-brother. The appellant argued that it did not, while the respondent argued that it did.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the term "brother" in Section 15(1)(a) secondly of the Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913, did not include a step-brother.
Issues: Whether the term "brother" in Section 15(1)(a) secondly of the Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913, included a step-brother.
Ratio Decidendi: The court reasoned that the law of pre-emption was a piratical law and had to be strictly construed. It also noted that the legislature could have made its intention clear by either defining the phrase "brother" or adding an explanation to Section 15(1)(a) first, that the expression brother would include a step-brother or a uterine-brother, but it had not done so.
Final Decision: The court allowed the appeal, set aside the judgment of the lower appellate court, and dismissed the plaintiff's suit.
D.K.Mahajan, J.
1. This appeal was posted for hearing before me on the 7th of November, 1966: and by my order of that date, I directed that this appeal be better heard by a Division Bench, in view of the importance of the question involved.
2. The only question, that requires determination in this appeal, is -- Whether the phrase brother in Section 15(1)(a) secondly of the Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913 includes a step-brother. It is common ground between the parties that if the phrase brother does not include a step-brother, the appeal must succeed and the suit for pre-emption, which has been filed by the step-brother of the vendor, must fail. But if the expression brother includes a step-brother, the decision of the trial Court must stay and the appeal will fail.
3. No other question, than the one indicated above, arises for determination; and it is not necessary to set out the facts of the case.
4. In order to appreciate the contentions of the learned counsel for the parties, it will be proper to set out the provisions of Section 15 of the Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913 (Punjab Act I of 1913) as well as the provisions of that very Section in the Punjab Pre-emption Act (Punjab Act 1 of 1913) as amended by Punjab Act 10 of 1980; and as further amended by Punjab Act 13 of 1964 (hereinafter referred to as the Act):-
-
Section 15 of the Punjab Pre-emption Act. 1913 (Punjab Act T of 1913)Section 15 of the Punjab Pre-emption Act (Punjab Act I of 1913), as amended by Punjab Act 10 of 1960; and as further amended by Punjab Act 13 of 1964.
15. Subject to the provisions of section 14, the right of pre-emption in respect of agricultural land and village immoveable property shall vest 15. (1) The right of pre-emption in respect of agricultural land and village immoveable property shall vest (a) where the sale is by a sole owner or occupancy tenant or. in the case of land or property jointly owned or held, is by ail the co-sharers jointly in the persons in order of succession, who but for such sale would be entitled, on the death of the vendor or vedors. to inherit the land or property sold:(a) where the sale is by a sole owner, First, in the son or daughter sons son daughters son of the vendor; secondly, in the brother or brothers on of the vendor; thirdly, in the fathers brother or lathers brothers son of the vendor; fourthly, in the tenant who holds under tenancy of the vendor the land or property sold or a part thereof;
(b) where the sale is of a share out of joint land or property, and is not made by all the co-sharers jointly firstly, in the lineal descendants of the vendor in order of succession; secondly, in the co-sharers, if any, who are agnates, in order of succession; thirdly in the persons, not included under firstly or secondly, above, in order of succession, who but for such sale would be entitled, on the death of the vendor to inherit the land or property sold: (b) where the sale is of a share out of joint land or property and is not made by all the co-sharers jointly, First, in the sons or daughters or sons sons or daughters sons of the vendor or vendors: Secondly, in the brothers or brothers sons of the vendor or vendors;
Thirdly, in the fathers brothers or fathers brothers sons of the vendor or vendors: fourthly, in the co-sharers, (c) if no person ha vine a right of pre-emption under clause (a) or clause (b) seeks to exercise it. - firstly, when the sale affects the superior or inferior properietary right and the superior right is sold, in the inferior properietors, and when the inferior right is sold, in the superior proprietors;
Fourthly, in the other co-sharers: Fifthly, in the tenants who hold under tenancy of the vendor or vendors the land or property sold or a Dart thereof: (c) where the sale is of land or property owned jointly and is made by all the co-sharers jointly, secondly, in the owners of the patti or other sub-division of the estate within the limits of which such land or property is situate;First,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.