SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(P&H) 16

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Harbans Singh, J.
Joginder Singh
Versus
Himachal Government Transport
F.A.O. No. 121 of 1962,
Decided On : JANUARY 18, 1966

The government is liable to pay damages for the negligence of its employees acting within the scope of their employment.

Headnote:

MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT - LIABILITY OF GOVERNMENT - NEGLIGENCE OF DRIVER - SCOPE OF EMPLOYMENT - COMPENSATION.

Fact of the Case:

A truck owned by the Himachal Pradesh Government was involved in an accident with a cycle, resulting in the death of a 16-year-old boy. The owner of the cycle filed a claim for compensation against the government, alleging negligence on the part of the driver.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the accident was caused by the rash and negligent act of the driver of the truck and that the Himachal Pradesh Government was liable to pay damages to the claimant.

Issues: 1. Whether the accident was due to the rash and negligent act of the driver of the truck and, if so, its effect? 2. Whether the Himachal Government Transport is liable in view of the objection taken up in para. 1 of the written statement filed by the respondent, in case the facts stated therein are proved? 3. What is the quantum of compensation due, if any, from whom to whom?

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Himachal Pradesh Government was liable to pay damages to the claimant because the driver of the truck was acting within the scope of his employment at the time of the accident. The court also held that the claimant was entitled to compensation for the loss of his son.

Final Decision: The court allowed the appeal, set aside the order of the lower tribunal, and remanded the case back to the tribunal for determination of the quantum of damages.

Judgment

1. This is an appeal against the order of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Punjab, dismissing the claim filed by Joginder Singh, whose son Kaka Singh, aged about 16 died in an accident on 11th of December, 1959.

2. Truck No. HIM-1015, owned by the Himachal Pradesh Government, admittedly was sent to Surajpur to load cement and transport the same to Rampur Bushehr. After obtaining the supply of cement, instead of going towards Kalka towards the left after joining the main Ambala-Kalka Road, the driver of the truck turned to the right, came to Panchkoola and was proceeding towards Mani Majra when. according to the allegations of Joginder Singh claimant, this truck-struck a cycle on which his son Kaka Singh was going to the same direction towards Mani Majra. Another boy, aged about 9, Sadhu Singh was sitting on the bar of the cycle. As a result of this collision the two boys fell down and suffered injuries. The injuries of Kaka Singh were serious. One Surjan Singh, who was nearby raised a raula, (noise) on seeing the accident and shouted to the driver of the truck to stop, but the truck speeded away. On his raising shouts Joginder Singh (different from Joginder Singh Claimant, hereinafter referred to as Joginder Singh I), who has land nearby and who had come with a pitcher to fill water nearby the culvert at a short distance from the place of accident, also came to the spot andra iscd a raulu (noise). Two trucks came thereafter also from the side of Panchkoola. According to Joginder Singh I, the occupiers of the latter of the two trucks were told on enquiry that an accident had taken place with a truck loaded with cement. Soon after Joginder Singh claimant came to the spot, and in a tonga the two injured boys were removed to the hospital, where Kaka Singh died. Sadhu Singh recovered after three or four days. First information report was lodged by Ajit Singh, grandfather of Kaka Singh deceased. According to the statement of Joginder Singh Claimant, he and others came to know that the truck in dispute had met with another accident near Mani Majra and was held up there.

3. The claim was put in against the Himachal Pradesh Government because they were the owners of the truck and it was stated in the claim that Dulo Ram driver by mistake turned towards Chandigarh and due to his negligence this accident took place and after a while his truck collided with another truck at Mani Majra.

4. In the written statement filed on behalf of the Himachal Pradesh Government the only point taken was that the Himachal Pradesh Government was not responsible for the alleged negligence of the driver resulting in the accident, because he had no authority to go towards Chandigarh and the accident, therefore, did not take place when he was acting for and on behalf of the Himachal Pradesh Government but when he was not on official duty and that his trip towards Chandigarh was a spree of his own. Thus no plea was taken that, in fact, the truck in question was not involved in the accident or if involved, there was no negligence on behalf of the driver. The following three issues were settled :

1. Whether the accident was due to the rash and negligent act of the driver of vehicle No. HIM-1015 and, if so, its effect ? 2. Whether the Himachal Government Transport is liable in view of the objection taken up in para. 1 of the written statement filed by the respondent, in case the facts stated therein are proved ? 3. What is the quantum of compensation due, if any, from whom to whom ?

5. During the course of evidence it appears that an application was made on behalf of the respondent that they should be allowed to amend the written statement and an additional issue should be settled as to whether the accident took place with the truck in question. The case was adjourned for reply and arguments, but no order seems to have been passed, though according to the counsel for the appellant before me, this application was rejected and that the order was announce









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top