PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
S.K.Kapur, J.
Paras Dass Jain
Versus
State
Criminal Revision No. 291-D of 1964,
Decided On : DECEMBER 16, 1965
PRESS AND REGISTRATION OF BOOKS ACT, 1867 - SECTION 3, 12 - PUBLICATION OF BOOK OR PAPER - MEANING AND SCOPE - MERE DISTRIBUTION OF PAMPHLET DOES NOT AMOUNT TO PUBLICATION.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner was convicted under Section 12 of the Press and Registration of Books Act, 1867, for publishing two handbills without complying with the requirements of Section 3 of the Act, which mandates the inclusion of the printer's and publisher's names and the place of printing and publication on the printed material.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the petitioner could be convicted under Section 12 for publishing the handbills without the required information, as the term "publish" in the Act encompasses the distribution of a book or paper that does not comply with Section 3's requirements.
Issues: 1. Whether the term "publish" in Section 12 of the Press and Registration of Books Act, 1867, includes the distribution of a book or paper that does not comply with the requirements of Section 3 of the Act. 2. Whether a mere distributor of a book or pamphlet can be convicted under Section 12 of the Act.
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court interpreted Section 12 of the Act to include the publication of a book or paper that does not bear the name of the publisher or the place of publication, as the purpose of the Act is to regulate the printing and publication of books and papers to ensure that the public is aware of the source of the information. 2. The court held that a mere distributor of a book or pamphlet cannot be convicted under Section 12 of the Act, as the term "publisher" in the Act refers to the person who arranges for the distribution of the material and not a mere seller or distributor.
Final Decision: The court allowed the petition, set aside the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, and quashed the conviction and sentence of the petitioner.
1. The petitioner has been convicted under Section 12 of the Press and Registration of Books Act. 1867, and sentenced to simple imprisonment for one month and a fine of Rs. 200 only. In default of payment of fine, he is required to further undergo simple imprisonment for one month.
2. A complaint was lodged by the State Press Officer, Delhi on 19-9-1963 in the Court of Shri M.M. Aggarwal, Magistrate, First Class, Delhi, that (1) respondent Paras Dass Jain published two handbills captioned " Janta Ko in Desli Drohiyon Se Bachaiye " and " Safed Posh Dakuon Se Savdhan ", (2) under, S. 3 of the said Act, he was required to give the names of the printer and publisher and the places of printing the publication on the handbills, which he failed to do; and (3) under S. 12 of the said Act, he was liable to penalty. The trial Court decided against the petitioner and convicted and sentenced him as above. Aggrieved by the said judgement, the petitioner filed an appeal in the Court of the Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, which was dismissed on 12-10-1964.
3. The first contention raised by Mr. Keshav Dayal on behalf of the petitioner is that a publisher of any book or paper cannot be convicted under the said Act inasmuch as S. 3 only refer to the printing of a book or paper and not its publication. According to the learned counsel, the words " or publish any book or paper otherwise than in conformity with the rule contained in S. 3 " in S. 12 make no meaning and, therefore, the words "or publish " must be ignored. In support of this plea, he has relied on Abdul Hakim V/s. State, AIR 1960 All 450. In that judgement, the view urged by the learned counsel for the petitioner was upheld. It is difficult for me to accept that contention and place that limited meaning on S. 12 of the said Act. Section 3 requires that every book or paper printed within India shall have printed legibly on it the name of the printer and the place of printing, and if the book or paper be published the name of the publisher and the " place of publication." Section 12 says that whoever shall print or publish any book or paper otherwise than in conformity with the rule contained in S. 3 shall, on conviction etc., be punished. It follows that if a book, which does not fulfil the requirements of S. 3, is published, the person responsible for the publication would be punishable under S. 12. Take a case where a person goes to a press and gels a paper or a book printed for public use. If that book or paper is to be published, it can be published only if it contains the name of the publisher and the place of publication. Publication of a book or paper not containing those particulars would be in violation of S. 12. Such a publisher would, therefore, be guilty. In Abdul Hakims case, AIR 1960 All 450, M.C. Desai, J. said, "he could be guilty under S. 12 only if he published it otherwise than in conformity with the provision of S. 3, but S. 3 does not govern the act of publishing at all. The act of printing is quite distinct from the act of publishing and S. 3 only regulates the act of printing, it requires certain matters to be printed in the book. Merely because one of the matters to be printed in the book is the name of the publisher and the place of publishing, it cannot be said that it regulates the act of publishing. If the name of the publisher and, the place of publication are not printed, it is, only the printing that can be said to be not in conformity with the provision of section 3 and not the act of publishing. " With utmost respect to the learned Judge, I am of the opinion that that is placing too narrow a construction oh the language of S. 12. The words "whoever shall print or publish any book or paper otherwise than in conformity with the rule contained in S. 3 of this Act" must embrace within themselves the publication of a book or paper which does not bear the name of the publisher or the place of publication. If a publisher finds that the book, which h
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.