SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(P&H) 273

MEHAR SINGH, P.C.PANDIT
Ude Chand – Appellant
Versus
Mst. Rajo – Respondent


Judgment

P.C.Pandit, J.

1. This order, will dispose of two connected Letters Patent Appeals Nos. 206 and 231 of 1961.

2. One Des Raj was the owner of 65 Bighas and 10 Biswas of land and a house in village Dharana. Tehsil Jhajjar, District Rohtak. On his death, the land was mutated in favour of his widow, Smt. Rajo. In November 1954. Ude Chand and others, who were the collaterals of Des Raj. brought a suit for possession of this property on the ground that Smt. Rajo had contracted a Karewa marriage with their brother Kesho Ram and had thus forfeited her rights in the property. The suit was resisted both by Smt. Rajo and Kesho Ram and they denied the alleged Karewa During the pendency of this suit, a compromise was effected between the parties on 17-6-1955. whereby Smt. Rajo was allowed to continue in possession of 40 bighas of land till her lifetime and after her death it had to go to the collaterals and Kesho Ram in equal shares The remaining land viz., 25 bighas 10 biswas. was to immediately pass on to the collaterals and Kesho Ram in equal shares. As regards the house, it was agreed that it belonged to Kesho Ram, Smt. Rajo was left with another residential house which was, however















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top