SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(P&H) 109

I.D.DUA, R.S.NARULA
Nand Lal Hira Lal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

Inder Dev Dua, J.

1. These four references (G.S.T. Rs. Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 of 1962) made by the learned Financial Commissioner under Section 9 (3) of the Central Sales Tax Act (Act 74 of 1956) read with Section 22(1) of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948, raise the same question of law and have, therefore, been heard together. Main arguments have been addressed in G.S.T. Rs. Nos. 2 and 3; Shri Gandhi has, however, supplemented in G.S.T.R. No. 1 arguments addressed by Shri Sibal in the other two cases.

2. The four questions referred by the learned Financial Commis--sioner may here be reproduced:-

-

(1) While not extending the Central Sales Tax Act No. 74 of 1956 to the State of Jammu and Kashmir or in other words not enacting that Act for the State of Jammu and Kashmir, did the Parliament by that Act formulate even its first principle of deter mining, when a sale or purchase of goods takes place in the course of inter-State trade or commerce, qua transaction of sale between dealers of other States of rest of India with those of the State of Jammu and Kashmir ?

(2) Whether by laying down in Section 1 (2), it extends to the whole of India except the State of Jammu and Kashm












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top